Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia and vision problems
Conclusion: Shows you can have enlarged veins that can hemmorhage at SV
as low as 2.02 and IgM of 1900 even though the literature says people
don't get symptoms until they reach SV of 4. In fact, it appears that by the
time you are SV4, it's almost guaranteed you have vision problems! When reduced
(e.g., below 2.2), vision returns to normal. See a doctor asap. disregarding can
lead to blindness. Each person is different. Even if the tests show nothing, you
could have blurred vision (see Salvitti post below). You can have IgM as low as
1850 that affect
your vision (if the igm attacks your eyes).
At least two people with blurring
upon examination showed no sausaging. In one, upon PP, vision and brain function
were restored. So WE are more sensitive than the tests!
In my case, I had SV 2.9 and IgM
of 4,000. Blurry vision at times in right eye. Eye exam did show a small drop of
blood in peripheral vein in the eye which isn't normal and suggests a viscosity
problem that is damaging blood vessels. The peripheral ones are the most
sensitive.
Permanent eye damage or loss of vision can
occur in a day
Maureen Hanley
Noticing a slight blurriness of vision in one eye can be caused by a host of
different problems. With an IGM of 4,000 one should have a dilated eye
examination at least twice a year. I coincidentally saw a patient today whose IGM was 4930 whose eyes were fine but some can have problems at this level. The
problem is you can have WM in the eye and have no symptoms unless the
hemorrhages are along the visual axis. Many times the first sign is dilated
veins and peripheral retina hemorrhages. There are also many other signs of
WM in the eye.
So if anyone with WM is having new vision problems they should call their
doctor. Even if they are not having problems if their IGM is over 3,000 they
should have a dilated eye examination. Many of the problems some
patients with WM have may not be related to WM but may be one of the many eye
conditions patients get between the ages of 40-80.
Fionna
Blurred vision, along with daily nosebleeds, and a feeling of disengagement with
my brain, were the symptoms which I first noticed before being diagnosed with an
IgM of 5240 and SV 4.1. I thought I needed new glasses, until the new ones made
no difference. The sausaging described were not noticeable upon examination, but
I was sent for a session of plasmapheresis which immediately restored my vision
and fuzzy brain. It was like a miracle. I underwent several more PPs over the
following six months before deciding on a course of further treatment.
Eunice Johnson
Let me add a point from my experience about blurred vision. Several months
before I was treated, I went to my ophthalmologist whom I had seen for regular
examinations for at least five years before. He was most familiar with the
"landscape" of the inside my eyes. He reminded me again that he had only read
about WM in textbooks but had never knowingly examined a WM patient's eyes other
than mine. (At an earlier appointment I had taken him articles about the
various ophthalmological features of WM.) At this earlier time I saw him after
diagnosis everything appeared to be normal. Later I started to experience what
I called "grey outs," jagged rainnbow-colored streaks, blurred vision . . .
those sent me back to him more than once. (Each visit he has examined the
retinas while my eyes were dilated.) The time just before treatment I noticed
he was looking at my retinas longer than usual, so I asked him what he saw. He
described the veins as being "tortuous." At that time my IgM around 4100 and SV
approaching 4.1. Even though the veins were not the usual "sausage-shaped"
description, though he didn't record it before he left the room, I
recommended that his assistant record it, which it eventually was. Then, I got
my eyes examined again about six months or so after treatment by which time both
the IgM and SV had been more than halved, and I asked him if the veins still had
the "tortuous" appearance. At first, he did not know what I was talking
about, and I suggested he look on the card to read what had been recorded at the
last visit as I explained what had happened. He then looked again and said
everything looked normal. MORAL of this story: Make sure things are recorded;
ask questions; one descriptor does not fit all.
Maria Colosi
blurred vision that would come and go with 4400 IGM 2.9 SV... [NOTE:
This is just like me!!!]
Gerri McDonald
You must see your eye doc and have them check you for hemorraghing behind
the retina. It's very simple to do, and they can tell immediately if
you have had any hemorraghing (sometimes called retinal lesions).
Shortly after my diagnosis 3 years ago, but before I started chemo I saw my opthalmologist for a routine eye exam. I mentioned that I had been
diagnosed with WM and he found several areas of retinal lesions...it scared
me. I was still in denial about the severity of my disease, but I knew that
I didn't want to play with losing my eyesight. I started chemo the next
month.
At diagnosis my IgM was 8008 and SV was 3.6. When I started chemo 3 months
later, my IgM was 9500 and SV was 5.0. The eye exam was somewhere in
between theses two blood tests.
My eye doc checked me monthly for 3 months, then again in 3 and 6 months.
The retinal lesions healed as I underwent my chemo regimine (FC-R). Now, I
see the opthalmologist only yearly, but he always checks for the
hemorraghing.
By the way, even though everyone says that this is completely
unrelated, during the year leading up to my diagnosis, nearly every month I
had one or more episodes of bleeding in my eyes. I think they call it
subjunctive bleeding, where you look in the mirror and suddenly see that
your eye is in a sea of red. This happened so often that I began tracking
it, and in that year I had about 14-15 episodes. Since my chemo, I've had
it only once or twice a year. I never had the blurry vision, but I'll bet
it's related to your SV
Sarah FitzGerald
Interesting timing, as I just went through
something like that. My eyes were blurring at times, especially mornings ( I think because I
hadn't had liquids for hours) My IgM was approx. 6000, and my SV was
2.8. Dr. Treon saw me at that point, several weeks ago, and ordered
some testing to be done to measure the vein size in my eyes. Turns out they
were really enlarged, to the point that I could hemmorhage or have an
aneurism. I began plasmapheresis soon after, the Monday before
Thanksgiving, to clear out the excess IgM. I had 5 sessions of pp, which
got my level of IgM down to 1600, and my SV to 1.6. I begin CPR tomorrow,
which I am extremely nervous about. B.F.
I was diagnosed with Waldenstrom's last August. My Hem/onc is Leo Gordon at
Northwestern Memorial in Chicago. However, I went to see Dr. Lacy at the
Mayo Clinic last month. She says I have smoldering Waldenstrom's. My IgM is
801 and my viscosity is 1.0. I have blurred vision is my left eye...it comes
and goes. I noticed it way before I was diagnosed. When I saw my
opthamologist, he checked for sausaging behind the eyes and there was none.
It just so happens that I vision is blurry today, and if I have misspelled
anything, it's because I'm having trouble reading the print on the computer.
I also have PN in my toes and the little fingers of my hand. When I was at
Mayo, I mentioned it, but I guess it didn't seem important at that time.
Now, that it seems to be progressing, I will ask Dr. Gordon. Rinat Atar
I had exactly the same: blurriness in one eye that comes and goes.
My IgM was then 9200 and SV 4.8
An eye exam detected retinal hamorrhages. After
plasmapheresis (SV went down to 2.2) my vision was back to normal.
Hope this helps. Julie Sintkowski
My brother (diagnosed 07/07) was seeing a similar blurry spot in his
eye, he let it go for a couple of days, and he thought it was
getting better, our sister-in-law is an optometrist and suggested he
go to an ophthalmologist ASAP... he did and had clots in the
vessels behind his eye. They did plasma pheresis to drop his
protein levels down and as his blood levels get better, the
blurriness decreases. They told him that it could have led to
blindness...and all sorts of other complications. I would recommend
making an appointment ASAP.
tom howenstine
I was dx 9-07....other than night sweats the only symptom I
think I had was blurred vision. Tx 4 r 10-07...igm 5100 sv 4.1 at
time of treatment ....recent flare after treatment igm 10000....sv
5.1...still experiencing
blurred vision but no night sweats age 63 Retina specialist who had
done
some research with lymphomas during residence thought possibility of
eyes just not getting enough oxygen. I'm slightly anemic. Tom
Howenstine
Don Brown
I would see your eye doctor so he can perform the proper test to check for
swollen blood vessel in the back of your eyes especially if you are having
blurred vision. This is a symptom of WM - it shouldn't matter what others
have experienced as you may be symptomatic. We are all different. I have
never had this symptom but have had this test and continue to have it at
least every two years whether I am symptomatic or not. Just a good
maintenance practice for a WMer. Gordon Green
My eyesight deteriorated prior to dx in 2004, best described as thousands of
tiny cells swimming in circles, particularly in bright light. It turns out I
was cryoglobulinemic. I was hospitalized for pp and developed severe
nosebleeds. The doctors kept checking my eyes for retinal damage. After
treatments my regular eye doctor said both retinas looked as if I had just
recovered from measles. They're fine now.
In my part of Canada (BC) they measure paraprotein which they believe is
more useful than straight IgM. My paraprotein was 36.2 g/L, which probably
translates into IgM of about 5,000. I have no record of SV. sue sawyer
Get thee to the eye doc without delay.....TODAY.....everyone who has had
blurred vision probably got it from all different IGMs.....we all react
differently....what is high to you, might be low to me. Peter DeNardis
The SV could be causing dilated retinal veins in the eye (this does
occur at elevated SV levels, but not for everybody). Past postings on
the talklist were made to the extent that we should all see an
opthamologist (hope I spelled that right) on a yearly basis to rule out
any problems in this regard. If you haven't seen one yet, it's would be
a good idea to do so. For medical-related information in this regard,
read about hyperviscosity syndrome at:
http://www.emedicine.com/emerg/topic756.htm
(Fortunately, personally, I haven't experienced blurring of vision, even
when my SV was 3.7 and IgM was 6500.) Salvitti, Ronald E CIV 60
EMS/MXMG
Steve, when my SV was 4.0 and my IgM was 6000 I had blurred vision. I
had a eye exam and everything looked fine but I started treatment
shortly after, mainly due to fatigue and headaches. I would get it
checked out as soon as you can.
howard prestwich
my wife had some vision problems flashes and lights not blurriness. You
ant to have your eyes checked now, immediately. the thickness of the
blood causes the blood vessels in the eyes to get sausage like
and could cause other vision problems. there is one lady on the talk
list, Hanley, who is an eye doctor. ask her
paul listen
At diagnosis, I had SV of 2.02 and IgM of 1900 and never noticed
blurred vision, although my optometrist saw definite sausaging/hemorrhaging
of the retinal capillaries. During chemo there was one day
when I had funky blurriness in one eye, but it cleared up after that
day. My IgM at that point was on its way down, and was somewhere around
1300-1400. No blurriness since then. My IgM is now 800.
Don't know my SV at this point, but optometrist says capillaries looking
almost normal now
eMedicine -
Hyperviscosity Syndrome Article by Thomas J Hemingway, MD
Ophthalmic examination may reveal decreased visual acuity, dilated
retinal veins, “sausage-linked” or “boxcar segmentation” of the retinal
veins, or retinal hemorrhages.
Maureen Hanley
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 7:36:27 0400
from Athens 2...
Patients who demonstrate signs or symptoms suggestive of symptomatic
hyperviscosity should be considered for immediate plasmapheresis and
initiation of chemotherapy.
An IgM level > 3 g/dL places patients at higher risk for
hyperviscosity and requires a thorough history for evidence of oronasal
bleeding, blurred vision, headache, dizziness, vertigo, ataxia,
encephalopathy, or altered consciousness. Funduscopic [=back of the eye
] examination is necessary to detect signs of hyperviscosity such as
venous dilatation, "sausage formation" hemorrhages, and exudates.
Measurement of serum viscosity should be performed if available. The
correlation between serum viscosity levels and symptoms is often poor
from patient to patient. However, the serum viscosity level correlates
well with clinical signs and symptoms in the same patient. Most patients
with a serum viscosity < 4 cp will not have symptoms of hyperviscosity
(normal = 1.8 cp)
Waldenström's macroglobulinemia‑associated retinopathy,
doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.036
Previously reported ocular manifestations of Waldenström's
macroglobulinemia include immunoprotein deposition in the cornea and
conjunctiva, serous retinal detachment, retinal vascular occlusions,
retinal hemorrhages, macular edema, and orbital pseudolymphoma[6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15] as well as IgM deposits in all layers
of the retina. [16]. This case demonstrates that a progressive
paraneoplastic retinopathy can occur in a patient with elevated serum
IgM levels associated with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.
Related articles
Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: A new approach
Steve Kirsch home page
|